We recommend suppressing the initial sentence away from section step 3

We surmise that results obtained from the experiments described in this section cannot serve to understand the role of I_NaL in arrhythmogenesis.

1. Van Driessche W, Lindemann B: Amount dependence from currents as a result of unmarried sodium-choosy pores inside the frog facial skin. Nature. 1979; 282 (5738): 519-520 PubMed Abstract | Blogger Full Text message

This means the fresh strong findings put forward from this manuscript was not justified and i also don’t approve the brand new manuscript inside setting

Brand new writers enjoys explained several of the inquiries We increased from inside the my personal early in the day remark. Regrettably, the biggest issues have not been treated by this modify. Once i manufactured in my earlier in the day remark, We consider they unrealistic that the individuals things can be solved only of the a few extra paragraphs. Rather there are particular basic concerns towards experimental construction and, really significantly, towards the investigation.

It indicates the fresh new good results submit from this manuscript is not rationalized and i also dont agree brand new manuscript inside form

This new people has actually explained a number of the inquiries We elevated during the my early in the day opinion. Unfortuitously, the major difficulties haven’t been handled from this modify. When i manufactured in my personal earlier remark, We deem they unrealistic that every those individuals factors is repaired only because of the a number of added sentences. Alternatively you may still find certain basic inquiries for the experimental structure and, extremely critically, on investigation.

• The greatest concern is if I then followed new description away from the methods in the earlier adaptation it absolutely was you can to decode, with nearly best reliability, people arbitrary stimulus names We chose. Discover to own samples of it reanalysis. Regardless of whether i pretend your real stimuli featured at the a later go out or are constantly switching between laws and quiet, brand new decryption is obviously near to prime. This is certainly an indication the decryption has nothing to-do with the real stimuli read by Transmitter it is opportunistically exploiting additional have regarding the data. The fresh new control research the newest people did, reversing the brand new stimulus labels, do not target this matter because it is afflicted with equivalent condition. Generally, just what classifier are allegedly having fun with is the time having enacted as the recording become.
• The explanation for this might be presumably the writers used non-separate data getting education and you can https://essayrevisor.com/page/become-a-writer/ review. Whenever I’m sure truthfully (pick part 3), arbitrary testing 1 / 2 of data examples out-of an EEG shade are not independent study. Continual the research five times the control analysis the fresh experts did isnt an acceptable cure for target it matter. At random wanting trials off a period series with which has slow alter (including the sluggish revolution pastime one to allegedly reigns over such tracks under these scenarios) have a tendency to usually contain solid temporal correlations. Pick TemporalCorrelations.jpg in for 2D density histograms and you will a relationship matrix indicating this.
• Because the modified strategies point brings greater detail now, it is still confused about just what research were utilized. Old-fashioned category data statement just what studies have (usual columns on the study matrix) and just what observations (typical rows) were used. Anything would-be a feature but generally speaking it is this new more EEG channels or fMRI voxels an such like. Findings are usually time factors. Here I guess the newest authors switched the new brutal products toward an excellent additional place having fun with dominant part analysis. It is not stated in case your dimensionality try smaller using the eigenvalues. In either case, I assume the knowledge examples (built-up from the 128 Hz) have been after that put since findings therefore the EEG channels transformed by PCA were used because the has. The latest stimuli labels have been assigned due to the fact On the otherwise Of for every single take to. A set of 50% out of samples (and labels) ended up being chosen at random to have degree, together with other individuals was utilized having evaluation. Is it best?